Grand Opening of Dr. Hedyeh Golshan’s Office
Rialto
officials optimistic about solving water problem
RIALTO
- City officials who head efforts to clean up a massive water contamination
problem in the city emote something new these days: optimism.
More than a decade after perchlorate and other industrial
chemicals were discovered in the local drinking water supply, members of the
City Council say a resolution may be in the not-too-distant offing.
"You don't know which tool is going to be most effective, and
frankly I think it's a combination of them," said Councilwoman Winnie Hanson, a
member of the council's perchlorate subcommittee.
After spending $26 million on perchlorate-related expenses,
last month the city was able to dismiss a federal lawsuit that would have begun
in December and been expensive to carry out.
Now the parties are in settlement talks, though a
confidentiality agreement makes it difficult to find out how those talks are
going.
Perchlorate is a chemical used to produce explosives, such as
rocket fuel. It is flowing for miles through the underground water supply from
an industrial site on the city's north end.
Though the city's Water Department and the other major water
purveyor in the city, the West Valley Water District, treat contaminated water
before serving it, the contamination could cost $200 million or more to clean
up. Perchlorate interferes with the functioning of the thyroid gland and could
be a particularly potent threat to pregnant women, unborn babies and children,
scientists say.
In addition to the settlement talks, the Environmental
Protection Agency is well on its way to declaring the source area of the
perchlorate a Superfund site. EPA's involvement is important because the agency
often intimidates suspected polluters. If they don't comply with its order, EPA
can recover up to three times the cost of doing the work.
A number of factors made Rialto's decision to
dismiss the lawsuit and enter settlement talks possible, said Scott Sommer, the
city's lawyer handling perchlorate matters.
First, San Bernardino County,
one of the potentially responsible parties, agreed to settle with the city and
clean up the western portion of the contamination.
Second, a state lawsuit similar to the federal one has not
yet been dismissed, though no trial date has been set. The existence of the
state lawsuit means the suspected polluters' insurance money is still in play.
Third, Rialto officials sensed the suspected
polluters were interested in serious settlement talks.
Fourth, Rialto can refile its suit within a year if
the talks don't work.
Finally, EPA has become more active at the site and would
demand a similar cleanup to the one Rialto - as well as
Colton
- sought in the lawsuit.
"I think the EPA being more aggressive and getting more
involved gave us a better comfort level in dismissing the lawsuit," said City
Councilman Ed Scott, the other member of the perchlorate subcommittee.
The effort to get EPA involved in Rialto required a lot of
lobbying, local officials said, including a March letter from Sen. Dianne
Feinstein to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson.
Feinstein said in a statement Wednesday she plans to
meet with Regional Administrator Wayne Nastri again soon about the issue.